If anything the UN UNDERPLAYED and underemphasized the widescale involvement of the Serbian government due to the geopolitical concerns of the western powers. The historian Marko Attila Hoare goes over it in his works particular recommendations go to "The Bosnian Genocide and the Srebrenica Massacre" (https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol6/iss1/12/) and "A Case Study in Underachievement: The International Courts and Genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina" (https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_eJ_2020_3_6_Articles_SS1_2_Nevenka_Tromp_00431_0.pdf). Other works from other authors include "The Issue of Genocidal Intent and Denial of Genocide" Which goes over how some cases were thrown out on appeal, without any contradicting evidence to weaken the case against the perpetrators, the cases were thrown out purely by Judge fiat and reinterpretation of the laws.
The Zdravko Tolimir case is an especially strong example as the court found that genocide wasn't just restricted to the one Srebrenica massacre, as the lying Serb propaganda you're posting here suggests. "The Appeals Chamber recalls here its earlier conclusion that the Trial Chamber did not err in finding that the Bosnian Muslims of Žepa were within the targeted part of the protected group and were thus among the ultimate victims of the genocidal enterprise against the Muslims of Eastern BiH." here's a link to that appeal judgement so you can read it for yourself (https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tolimir/acjug/en/150408_summary.pdf) But of course as you know despite saying he was responsible for ordering genocide (orders which were carried out) the court also paradoxically decided to rule that no wider Bosnian Genocide occurred. This inspite of the fact that not only did they rule similarly against other perpetrators but despite of the fact that those were not only officers in the army, Serbia paid out their state pensions afterwards, facts that were never used as evidence against Serbia (Misjudging the History at the ICTY).
The evidence is so clear that Republika Srpska as a state was responsible that EVEN IN the Judgement "exonerating" it, the "exonerating" evidence is that they never said it explicitly EVEN THOUGH IN THE SAME JUDGEMENT THEY POINT TO DEFINITIVE PROOF that Serbian officials intentionally coached terms (The Issue of Genocidal Intent and Denial of Genocide) and in other cases the "exonerating" evidence is that even though all the evidence points to Genocide, the court had pre-ruled that Genocide only happened in Srebrenica such as in the case of Goran Jelisic "In May 1992, Goran Jelisic, intending to destroy a substantial or significant part of the Bosnian Muslim people as a national, ethnical or religious group, systematically killed Muslim detainees at the Laser Bus Co., the Brcko police station and Luka camp. He introduced himself as the "Serb Adolf", said that he had come to Brcko to kill Muslims and often informed the Muslim detainees and others of the numbers of Muslims he had killed. In addition to killing countless detainees, whose identities are unknown" (https://www.icty.org/x/cases/jelisic/tjug/en/).
The motive for this is that Bill Clinton and other Western powers primarily every Arabs best friend The United Kingdom and France, Wanted to avoid the formation of a Muslim state in Eastern Europe (But Bosnia ended up being formed anyway), yeah the exact same powers that fucked over Palestine and the levant in general (the source for this is Taylor Branch a presidential confidant for Bill "Ask Michigan Muslims to think about the Jews during the Gaza Genocide" Clinton). The reason they couldn't ramp up prosecution for the genocide afterwards is the same reason they'll probably try to avoid or limit the ruling that the current Gaza Genocide is exactly that, because they would be legally complicit for not doing anything (or in the case of most of them, actively aiding) the genocide.
I agree with the wider point that the International Jews Based Order isn't out to "spread democracy" or "prevent atrocities" or any such nonsense, but cut the Serb bullshit, you're not even a Serb so why spread their lies? I hope you remember spouting this Talmudic "there was no Bosnian Genocide" shit, when the Kikes use all the same tricks against us, after the inevitable dismissal or diminishment of the case against Israel
"the Srebrenica massacre (there was no genocide)"
If anything the UN UNDERPLAYED and underemphasized the widescale involvement of the Serbian government due to the geopolitical concerns of the western powers. The historian Marko Attila Hoare goes over it in his works particular recommendations go to "The Bosnian Genocide and the Srebrenica Massacre" (https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol6/iss1/12/) and "A Case Study in Underachievement: The International Courts and Genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina" (https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_eJ_2020_3_6_Articles_SS1_2_Nevenka_Tromp_00431_0.pdf). Other works from other authors include "The Issue of Genocidal Intent and Denial of Genocide" Which goes over how some cases were thrown out on appeal, without any contradicting evidence to weaken the case against the perpetrators, the cases were thrown out purely by Judge fiat and reinterpretation of the laws.
The Zdravko Tolimir case is an especially strong example as the court found that genocide wasn't just restricted to the one Srebrenica massacre, as the lying Serb propaganda you're posting here suggests. "The Appeals Chamber recalls here its earlier conclusion that the Trial Chamber did not err in finding that the Bosnian Muslims of Žepa were within the targeted part of the protected group and were thus among the ultimate victims of the genocidal enterprise against the Muslims of Eastern BiH." here's a link to that appeal judgement so you can read it for yourself (https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tolimir/acjug/en/150408_summary.pdf) But of course as you know despite saying he was responsible for ordering genocide (orders which were carried out) the court also paradoxically decided to rule that no wider Bosnian Genocide occurred. This inspite of the fact that not only did they rule similarly against other perpetrators but despite of the fact that those were not only officers in the army, Serbia paid out their state pensions afterwards, facts that were never used as evidence against Serbia (Misjudging the History at the ICTY).
The evidence is so clear that Republika Srpska as a state was responsible that EVEN IN the Judgement "exonerating" it, the "exonerating" evidence is that they never said it explicitly EVEN THOUGH IN THE SAME JUDGEMENT THEY POINT TO DEFINITIVE PROOF that Serbian officials intentionally coached terms (The Issue of Genocidal Intent and Denial of Genocide) and in other cases the "exonerating" evidence is that even though all the evidence points to Genocide, the court had pre-ruled that Genocide only happened in Srebrenica such as in the case of Goran Jelisic "In May 1992, Goran Jelisic, intending to destroy a substantial or significant part of the Bosnian Muslim people as a national, ethnical or religious group, systematically killed Muslim detainees at the Laser Bus Co., the Brcko police station and Luka camp. He introduced himself as the "Serb Adolf", said that he had come to Brcko to kill Muslims and often informed the Muslim detainees and others of the numbers of Muslims he had killed. In addition to killing countless detainees, whose identities are unknown" (https://www.icty.org/x/cases/jelisic/tjug/en/).
The motive for this is that Bill Clinton and other Western powers primarily every Arabs best friend The United Kingdom and France, Wanted to avoid the formation of a Muslim state in Eastern Europe (But Bosnia ended up being formed anyway), yeah the exact same powers that fucked over Palestine and the levant in general (the source for this is Taylor Branch a presidential confidant for Bill "Ask Michigan Muslims to think about the Jews during the Gaza Genocide" Clinton). The reason they couldn't ramp up prosecution for the genocide afterwards is the same reason they'll probably try to avoid or limit the ruling that the current Gaza Genocide is exactly that, because they would be legally complicit for not doing anything (or in the case of most of them, actively aiding) the genocide.
I agree with the wider point that the International Jews Based Order isn't out to "spread democracy" or "prevent atrocities" or any such nonsense, but cut the Serb bullshit, you're not even a Serb so why spread their lies? I hope you remember spouting this Talmudic "there was no Bosnian Genocide" shit, when the Kikes use all the same tricks against us, after the inevitable dismissal or diminishment of the case against Israel
Side note
"The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising"
The Holocaust was fake, (https://archive.org/details/holocaust-encyclopedia-uncensored-and-unconstrained) so we can hold the Jews responsible for what they did (and still do) to the Germans and various people of Europe (and the world really)
>Believes in Dah Shoah!
>Denies the real Bosnian Genocide